_:warning: Potential issue_
**Ensure `StructuredIrUnitHandler` inherits from `IrUnitHandlerInterface`.**
The class documentation indicates that `StructuredIrUnitHandler` implements `clp::ffi::ir_...
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Add overflow check for node ID increment**
The current node ID increment could potentially overflow. Consider adding bounds checking.
```diff
+ if (m_current_nod...
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Add bounds checking for timestamp casting**
The current implementation might overflow when casting large integers to epoch_time_ms_t.
```diff
+ auto const ra...
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_
**Add input validation and improve error handling**
Consider validating the input log event and handling potential errors from get_timestamp and get_log_...
I haven't tried this, so maybe there's some unforeseen limitation, but I think a clean approach is:
* Make StreamReader a template class that takes the log event type as a template parameter.
*...
- We don't need to check any error code on the end of stream; the end of stream is handled as an IR unit; you can check the returned IR unit type to confirm (but that should also be a part of the j...
Sorry, can we update it to follow https://github.com/y-scope/clp-loglib-py/blob/main/.github/workflows/pr-title-checks.yaml? That's the latest version of this that we should propagate across all re...
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: review in progress by coderabbit.ai -->
> [!NOTE]
> Currently processing new changes ...
1. Sure
2. clang-tidy [discourages](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/pro-type-vararg.html) variadic functions.
3. Sure, but how would that help?
@junhaoliao, you're correct. The expression `log_event_idx + 1` does not pose an integer overflow risk since `log_event_idx` is of type `size_t`. My previous suggestion was unnecessary. I apologize...
more of a preference. feel free to disagree
```suggestion
auto const& timestamp_pair{id_value_pairs.at(m_timestamp_node_id.value())};
if (false == timestamp_pair.has_value()) {
...
@kirkrodrigues
1. Shall we use `std::enable_if<std::is_same_v<>>` for `ts_pattern`?
2. if not, do we consider Pack / variadic arguments a bad coding practice in C++? can that be used here?
3. i...