We will definitively check again when we have 64bit support, gas metering and everything. Also if either one is more efficient in either dimension (code size vs. execution performance), we can just...
you mean like we do with ext_code_hash? https://github.com/paritytech/revive/blob/cc38c374810f37a6d0a89b46681e944050a8d4d0/crates/integration/src/tests.rs#L238
Would you mind using an instantiator contract to test this instead? It will make it a lot more obvious what is going on. And also be much easier to port into the upcoming new test format.
The dr...
> Very nice catch, thanks!
>
> So this PR fixes two problems: The storage pointer values should not be truncated to the register size so that arbitrary storage keys work, not just ones that fall...
We're currently reversing key on specs to make it work. It may be useful for readability on db side i.e doing query but will add more instructions. So I am not sure we need it
Very nice catch, thanks!
So this PR fixes two problems: The storage pointer values should not be truncated to the register size so that arbitrary storage keys work, not just ones that fall below...