@jsync-swirlds thanks for the reviews.
Keep in mind that when I was doing the changes, my aim was to only `redirect` all current usages of the utilities and constants to the new `common` module ...
Agreed about that. Based on comments above and on what we shall agree on, if to remove or not the `filePerms` field in the super, this would either become `null` and the actual reader will use the ...
Good question, I am not sure as well. The file perms are used in a method inside the remover `remove(long)`. Based on the comments inside and the single usage it has currently, I believe the method...
Agreed about that, but since this class is not a production class, do you envision that we will ever need anything else than the defaults, meaning to use the overloaded method? If not, can we then ...
I agree for the constants of the file permissions that should be private, it does make sense for them to be only part of the `FileUtilities` _internally_.
I made them public, because I only want...
I seem to be confused about this.
Technically we will always either create a directory or a file. We will never need both `filePermissions` and `folderPermissions`, we technically need only one ...