Ecosyste.ms: Timeline

Browse the timeline of events for every public repo on GitHub. Data updated hourly from GH Archive.

csg-org/CompactConnect

jlkravitz created a review comment on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
Got it -all good. Thanks for the explanation!

View on GitHub

jlkravitz created a review on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect

View on GitHub

landonshumway-ia created a review comment on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
Good call out, initially I had it as an optional field, but there's no reason it shouldn't be required. All of our current configuration files have it included, so I will remove this check and we'l...

View on GitHub

landonshumway-ia created a review on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect

View on GitHub

ChiefStief created a review comment on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
@jlkravitz Sorry I was just confirming why we do this. This is something we do across the codebase. This is just a sanity thing so that we can cleanly define what the properties are going to be ...

View on GitHub

ChiefStief created a review on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect

View on GitHub

jlkravitz created a review on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
looks good! couple nits

View on GitHub

jlkravitz created a review comment on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
If an option, why not store the version as an integer rather than as a string?

View on GitHub

jlkravitz created a review comment on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
Could this ever happen? Is `attestations` not a required field?

View on GitHub

jlkravitz created a review comment on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
What does this comment mean? (What is 'this'?)

View on GitHub

jlkravitz created a review on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
looks good! couple nites

View on GitHub

jlkravitz created a review on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
looks good! couple nites

View on GitHub

jusdino created a review comment on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
Yes, your understanding is correct. I don't see any cases where that would not be true for our data model but, now that you point it out, I don't think I want this limitation hiding in the code her...

View on GitHub

jusdino created a review on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect

View on GitHub

jusdino created a review comment on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
Yeah, we can talk through separator and b64 alphabet character choice when we do a design view. Ultimately, it doesn't matter a lot what we choose for separators vs 62nd, 63rd b64 characters, as lo...

View on GitHub

jusdino created a review on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect

View on GitHub

jusdino created a review comment on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
Yeah, good call out. We can do a team design review to mull this over before committing to it.

View on GitHub

jusdino created a review on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect

View on GitHub

jusdino created a review on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
Great! Ready for you, @jlkravitz .

View on GitHub

landonshumway-ia created a review comment on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
same here: `_populate_update_record`

View on GitHub

landonshumway-ia created a review comment on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
Great check 👍

View on GitHub

landonshumway-ia created a review comment on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
nit: should start with underscore if we don't intend to call it outside of this file: `_process_license_update`

View on GitHub

landonshumway-ia created a review comment on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
Just need to check my understanding here: with the way this is structured, it suggests that the base license and privilege records will ALWAYS come first in the array before any update records for ...

View on GitHub

landonshumway-ia created a review comment on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
This right here makes me wonder if we should consider choosing other separators if we need to have logic like this... Are there not other options we could use that wouldn't require this?

View on GitHub

landonshumway-ia created a review comment on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
This is a pretty critical piece, as whatever pattern we choose we will essentially be locked into forever to determine the update records by hash. I am trying to walk through any drawbacks with thi...

View on GitHub

landonshumway-ia created a review comment on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
We should also have a log statement showing that we are restoring the record and what the change would have been. Given that we don't expect this code to get exercised very often, we should be fine...

View on GitHub

landonshumway-ia created a review comment on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
missing a error log message here that would be useful for context

View on GitHub

landonshumway-ia created a review comment on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
it may be helpful to have a log message here noting that we are deleting something, so we at least have some paper trail of what record would have shown up in the system

View on GitHub

landonshumway-ia created a review comment on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
We should leave a comment here explicitly calling out why we append the provider privilegeJurisdictions update last, so no one ever moves it to an earlier step in the algorithm.

View on GitHub

jlkravitz created a review comment on a pull request on csg-org/CompactConnect
@ChiefStief Flagging this before we merge. If this is something we've been doing across our codebase, we can ignore!

View on GitHub

Load more