Ecosyste.ms: Timeline

Browse the timeline of events for every public repo on GitHub. Data updated hourly from GH Archive.

jvdsn

jvdsn deleted a branch jvdsn/cPP

atsec22

jvdsn deleted a branch jvdsn/cPP

atsec02

jvdsn deleted a branch jvdsn/cPP

atsec12

jvdsn deleted a branch jvdsn/cPP

atsec15

jvdsn deleted a branch jvdsn/cPP

atsec21

jvdsn deleted a branch jvdsn/cPP

atsec11

jvdsn pushed 504 commits to main jvdsn/cPP
  • Removed duplicate text From original Word Doc, the deleted text was actually duplicated somehow in the production of... 6a38f26
  • remove FCS_COP.1/KDF reference This is to resolve #10 based on comments from atsec. fcb6e02
  • editorial fixes Found accidental missed # in an underline marker. Table 12 has VERY large row merges that cause pro... 369b467
  • Changes for the DSC0001 TD This is the change for the DSC0001 TD applied to the adoc f0c97d9
  • remaining changes for DSC0003 TD The rest of the changes included in the DSC0003 TD are added here. 0a6c6a1
  • DSC0004 TD update Changes from DSC0004 edit made to the adoc d509421
  • Edits based on review of cPP edits found reviewing up through section 6.7 while reviewing v1.0 PDF c1152da
  • completed cPP review completed second half of cPP review edits. 9d4db3f
  • update for SD review full review of SD for any remaining fidelity issues 3705b79
  • cPP atsec/6 fix edit for #6 78dac4a
  • Update cPP_DSC.adoc 96779b1
  • TD DSC0005 This is to implement the change for TD DSC0005 0fd7a15
  • Update cPP_DSC.adoc 63d98d4
  • Merge pull request #112 from DSC-iTC/DSC0001-edit Changes for the DSC0002 TD 0cbd8e2
  • Merge pull request #113 from DSC-iTC/DSC0004-TD-update DSC0004 TD update 51940b0
  • Merge pull request #114 from DSC-iTC/atsec/6-fix cPP atsec/6 fix 6d688da
  • Merge pull request #115 from DSC-iTC/cPP-atsec/8-fix Update cPP_DSC.adoc ed1343f
  • Merge pull request #108 from DSC-iTC/FCS_COP.1/KDF-remove remove FCS_COP.1/KDF reference (TD DSC0003) 2e29cbf
  • cPP editorials This is to close #6, close #8, close #9, close #40 and close #41. These are simple editorial changes. 7fb5589
  • atsec editorial SD changes This is to close #18, close #19, close #21, close #25, close #26, close #27, close #28, a... 9633085
  • and 484 more ...

View on GitHub

jvdsn created a comment on an issue on usnistgov/ESV-Server
I just got forwarded the email, it sounds like the web client should still work, so I'll try that.

View on GitHub

jvdsn closed an issue on usnistgov/ESV-Server
404 Not Found for https://esvts.nist.gov:7443/esv/v1/login
There was an email recently about updating the ESVTS for Demo users, however I am trying to access the Production server. Below are the requests being made by our client: ``` ACVPProxy (18:23...
jvdsn created a comment on an issue on usnistgov/ESV-Server
@jarnold01 ah, it looks like I'm not on the prod list, that's unfortunate. I'll try to get that sorted out. Just to clarify, does that mean the ESV server will be completely unavailable until Ja...

View on GitHub

jvdsn created a comment on an issue on usnistgov/CMVP
I use `jq` as a local tool, but I'm not sure how that would work for web interfaces. Maybe there's a javascript variant but I can understand NIST is careful about including external dependencies.

View on GitHub

jvdsn created a comment on an issue on usnistgov/CMVP
I suggest "Volatile" and "Persistent" instead of "Dynamic" and "Static" respectively. Currently "Dynamic" and "Static" may cause confusion with the different RAM (DRAM vs SRAM) types, though both o...

View on GitHub

jvdsn opened an issue on usnistgov/ESV-Server
404 Not Found for https://esvts.nist.gov:7443/esv/v1/login
There was an email recently about updating the ESVTS for Demo users, however I am trying to access the Production server. Below are the requests being made by our client: ``` ACVPProxy (18:23...
jvdsn created a comment on a pull request on latchset/kryoptic
For what it's worth, if you're ever thinking about certifying KMAC, OpenSSL < 3.4 doesn't have a check. OpenSSL 3.4+ should have a check.

View on GitHub

jvdsn created a review comment on a pull request on latchset/kryoptic
Is it intended to use 32 or 64 bits here? The comment seems to reference 64 bits but the code uses 32 bits.

View on GitHub

jvdsn created a review on a pull request on latchset/kryoptic

View on GitHub