_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_
**Consider organizing test cases into sub-test groups.**
The test suite would benefit from organizing related test cases into logical groups using subtes...
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_
**Improve handling of pending test cases.**
Rather than maintaining commented-out test cases, consider:
1. Moving these test cases to a separate file (e....
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_
**Consider enabling and refactoring the commented test cases.**
The commented test cases cover important scenarios but are currently disabled. Consider:
...
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_
**Convert input validation tests to table-driven tests.**
The input validation tests share similar structure and could be simplified using table-driven t...
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_
**Enhance test readability and error messages.**
Consider using subtests to better organize test scenarios and improve error messages:
```go
// Example ...
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_
**Consider using table-driven tests for similar scenarios.**
The failure test cases (lines 36-189) follow similar patterns and could be refactored into a...
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_
**Consider enhancing test coverage and reducing duplication.**
While the test cases are comprehensive for basic scenarios, consider the following improve...
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_
**Consider using subtests for better organization**
The test contains multiple scenarios that could be organized into subtests for better clarity and fai...
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Consider improving test isolation**
The comment "Carries 500 from distribute e2e" suggests test interdependence. Tests should be independent and self-contained to pr...
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_
**Enhance error validation in argument count test.**
The test verifies that an error occurs but doesn't validate the specific error message or type. Cons...
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_
**Improve test descriptions and add edge cases.**
The validator address tests could be more comprehensive. Consider:
1. More descriptive test names that ...
_:bulb: Codebase verification_
**Empty receive function requires implementation or justification**
The receive function in TestDistribute contract lacks proper implementation:
- No accounting of ...
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_
**Consider consolidating error handling.**
The error handling for topics and data packing follows the same pattern across all logging methods. Consider e...
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Fix typo in event name constant.**
There's a typo in the event name constant that could cause runtime issues:
```diff
- event := c.Abi().Events[DisitributeEventName...
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_
**Consider adding validation for ZRC20ToCosmosDenom result.**
While the change to use `ptypes.ZRC20ToCosmosDenom` is correct, consider validating that th...
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_
**Enhance test coverage with multiple validators.**
The current test only verifies a single validator scenario. Consider adding test cases with multiple ...
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_
**Consider additional validation and error handling optimization.**
The function handles address validation well but could benefit from additional input ...
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_
**Consider adding edge case tests.**
The test suite would benefit from additional test cases covering edge cases and error scenarios.
Consider adding te...
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Consider adding input validation and simplifying error handling.**
The function declares an error return but never returns a non-nil error. Additionally, it lacks in...
_:bulb: Codebase verification_
**Remove unnecessary payable functions**
The contract implementation shows that both `fallback()` and `receive()` payable functions are empty and unused. The contra...
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Consider adding access control to distribution function**
The `distributeThroughContract` function handles token distribution but lacks access control modifiers. Thi...
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_
**Consider refactoring test setup for better maintainability.**
While the setup is functional, it could be improved by:
1. Moving the mock setup to a hel...
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_
**Enhance test structure and fix typo in error message.**
While the test cases are well-documented, they could be improved by:
1. Using subtests for bett...
_:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_
**Enhance input validation robustness**
While the current validation is good, consider adding the following improvements:
1. Add nil checks for `ctx` and...
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Avoid hardcoded contract address and emit initialization event**
The hardcoded address for the distribute contract could cause issues across different environments.
...
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Add input validation and event emission to distribution function**
The distribution function should validate inputs and emit events for better traceability.
```diff...
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Fix incorrect documentation in ZRC20ToCosmosDenom.**
The function comment states the conversion format as "zevm/{ZRC20Address}" but the actual implementation uses "z...
_:warning: Potential issue_
**Enhance modifier security with descriptive revert message**
The onlyOwner modifier should provide a clear error message.
```diff
modifier onlyOwner() {
- ...