Ecosyste.ms: Timeline
Browse the timeline of events for every public repo on GitHub. Data updated hourly from GH Archive.
github-merge-queue[bot] created a branch on zeta-chain/node
gh-readonly-queue/develop/pr-2987-7b2bbe763d7a180befc8254b0cf3142e8c1b5d60 - ZetaChain’s blockchain node and an observer validator client
ws4charlie created a review comment on a pull request on zeta-chain/node
Yeah. SOL and TON will use their own structs defined in gateway.
ws4charlie pushed 2 commits to feat-inbound-memo zeta-chain/node
ws4charlie pushed 2 commits to doc-non-evm-inbound-memo-format zeta-chain/node
github-merge-queue[bot] deleted a branch zeta-chain/node
gh-readonly-queue/develop/pr-3011-ae6ab23ac732a5b0cfd92e4637f8ceb0441bfc1e
lumtis closed a pull request on zeta-chain/node
docs: update readme with new protocol contract directories
# Description Update the readme to add link to Solana and TON contracts <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Documentation**...
github-merge-queue[bot] pushed 1 commit to develop zeta-chain/node
- docs: update readme with new protocol contract directories (#3011) 7b2bbe7
lumtis created a review comment on a pull request on zeta-chain/node
Do we still need `ModuleBasics` as a public variable?
lumtis created a review comment on a pull request on zeta-chain/node
Do we have an issue? Maybe we can add more details on this?
swift1337 created a review on a pull request on zeta-chain/node
LGTM. The only topic left is to agree on the terminology
lumtis created a review on a pull request on zeta-chain/node
Looks good to me for initialization, tests will be either to visualize once we have actual E2E tests
lumtis created a review comment on a pull request on zeta-chain/node
>Solana and TON will use some similar structs (per @lumtis). As discussed on Slack, not TON nor Solana will use it but I personally do see the issue with InboundMemo terminology, I think the ter...
fbac created a review comment on a pull request on zeta-chain/node
Removed the ZEVM variable and moved everything to use the original EVM one in f20129df6881a8c92d6fc46e4ef56479823a2177
fbac created a review comment on a pull request on zeta-chain/node
Changed in f20129df6881a8c92d6fc46e4ef56479823a2177
fbac created a review comment on a pull request on zeta-chain/node
I'm not sure if the suggested change makes any difference?
fbac created a review comment on a pull request on zeta-chain/node
Removed in f20129df6881a8c92d6fc46e4ef56479823a2177, confirmed it's unused.
fbac created a review comment on a pull request on zeta-chain/node
The thing is bank is explicitly designed for ZRC20, including all the methods under zrc20_methods.go, to keep it consistent I'd like to maintain it with the reference to ZRC20.
coderabbitai[bot] created a review on a pull request on zeta-chain/node
**Actionable comments posted: 0** <details> <summary>🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>readme.md (3)</summary><blockquote> `22-28`: **Enhance...
coderabbitai[bot] created a comment on a pull request on zeta-chain/node
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai --> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: review in progress by coderabbit.ai --> > [!NOTE] > Currently processing new changes ...