Ecosyste.ms: Timeline

Browse the timeline of events for every public repo on GitHub. Data updated hourly from GH Archive.

posit-dev/py-shiny

cpsievert pushed 1 commit to markdown-stream-component posit-dev/py-shiny
  • Remove the .ui() entirely from shiny.ui.MarkdownStream 95f271a

View on GitHub

cpsievert pushed 2 commits to markdown-stream-component posit-dev/py-shiny
  • Go back to output_markdown_stream() a99b3a5
  • Update API reference 2496cc0

View on GitHub

cpsievert pushed 1 commit to markdown-stream-component posit-dev/py-shiny
  • Take another pass at polishing docstrings 96d6db0

View on GitHub

cpsievert created a review comment on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny
I get where you're coming from. I think it could technically work since there's not currently any important state management going on, but it makes me feel uneasy that it would handcuff future desi...

View on GitHub

cpsievert created a review on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny

View on GitHub

cpsievert created a review comment on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny
> but we should also have content_type as an argument in stream() I agree, but unfortunately it wouldn't be support that combined with `.stream(clear=False)` since you could end up with a mix of...

View on GitHub

cpsievert created a review on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny

View on GitHub

cpsievert created a review comment on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny
Done in [d091ebd](https://github.com/posit-dev/py-shiny/pull/1782/commits/d091ebdedb97b6f222f8284c5ac05695d1942b42)

View on GitHub

cpsievert created a review on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny

View on GitHub

cpsievert created a review comment on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny
Addressed in [d091ebd](https://github.com/posit-dev/py-shiny/pull/1782/commits/d091ebdedb97b6f222f8284c5ac05695d1942b42)

View on GitHub

cpsievert created a review on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny

View on GitHub

cpsievert created a review comment on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny
Addressed as a note in [d091ebd](https://github.com/posit-dev/py-shiny/pull/1782/commits/d091ebdedb97b6f222f8284c5ac05695d1942b42) If you feel strongly about `.append()`, would you mind filing a...

View on GitHub

cpsievert created a review on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny

View on GitHub

cpsievert created a review comment on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny
Done in [add7b2f](https://github.com/posit-dev/py-shiny/pull/1782/commits/add7b2f48526adc67b8340ef77c2e76e8d4ac825)

View on GitHub

cpsievert created a review on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny

View on GitHub

gadenbuie created a review comment on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny
Sorry, I found https://github.com/posit-dev/py-shiny/pull/1782#discussion_r1936243033 after writing this. But no, from a user perspective I don't think I'd find it weird. For me, the defining fe...

View on GitHub

gadenbuie created a review on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny

View on GitHub

cpsievert created a review comment on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny
Done in [add7b2f](https://github.com/posit-dev/py-shiny/pull/1782/commits/add7b2f48526adc67b8340ef77c2e76e8d4ac825)

View on GitHub

cpsievert created a review on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny

View on GitHub

cpsievert pushed 2 commits to markdown-stream-component posit-dev/py-shiny
  • Take a pass at addressing documentation feedback d091ebd
  • Address JS feedback add7b2f

View on GitHub

gadenbuie created a review comment on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny
If we use `md.ui()`, we wouldn't have the "is it an output or not?" problem.

View on GitHub

gadenbuie created a review on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny

View on GitHub

gadenbuie created a review comment on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny
Could we make it work? If not, I think the documentation needs to be a bit stronger: like _don't use this in Core!_ But I'd rather not solve this with documentation; if we can save people from ...

View on GitHub

gadenbuie created a review on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny

View on GitHub

gadenbuie created a review comment on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny
lol I called this out in comments, I think the paired `@render...` function detail is probably not how most users will think of what's an output vs what's an input. I think that most people will se...

View on GitHub

gadenbuie created a review on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny

View on GitHub

gadenbuie created a review comment on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny
Might as well throw since it's in a message handler and won't bring down the app. That would just increase visibility (in dev mode we'd see the error in the client console).

View on GitHub

gadenbuie created a review on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny

View on GitHub

cpsievert created a review comment on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny
If we call it `output_markdown_stream()`, would you expect there to be a `@render.markdown_stream`?

View on GitHub

cpsievert created a review on a pull request on posit-dev/py-shiny

View on GitHub

Load more