Ecosyste.ms: Timeline
Browse the timeline of events for every public repo on GitHub. Data updated hourly from GH Archive.
TechnikTobi created a branch on TechnikTobi/little_exif
debug_dev_0.6.0 - A little library for reading and writing EXIF data in pure Rust.
TechnikTobi created a comment on an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
Could you please re-try this with the 0.6.0 beta and check if ThumbsPlus is still unable to read the tags after writing? Ideally with the exact same original example file you provided here?
TechnikTobi created a comment on an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
Does this problem still persist with the 0.6.0 beta?
TechnikTobi closed an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
assertion panic
``` 917: copying //marianne-1/public/hdd_1_1_1/Fotos/002/00249 Bonn 05/DSC72343.JPG -> t:/test/9170_DSC72343.JPG Fidelity, Bonn-Hardtberg, Juli 2005 thread 'main' panicked at C:\Users\Michael Sch...
mschnell1 created a comment on an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
Sorry wrong file uploaded. it's: www.bitvibe.de/Upload/2017_isernhagen_sorento_1.jpg (Wich you already do know)
mschnell1 created a comment on an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
Here you are... www.bitvibe.de/Upload/ds218351.jpg
TechnikTobi created a comment on an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
Do you have an example where 0.5.1 recognizes EXIF data but 0.6.0-beta1 doesn't?
mschnell1 opened an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
v0.6.0-beta.1 does not recognize even more Exif in even more file
I get e.g. this messages by Little_Exif: Error during decoding: Custom { kind: Other, error: "No EXIF data found!" } I did provide several files that showed that behavior But with Beta.1 i...
TechnikTobi created a comment on an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
> My question was if (in what cases) it is possible that the next `next()` will return a `Some`, and what exactly that means. `Some(ExifTag)` is returned with the first such tag that matches wh...
TechnikTobi created a comment on an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
Please also provide an example file! :)
mschnell1 opened an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
assertion panic
917: copying //marianne-1/public/hdd_1_1_1/Fotos/002/00249 Bonn 05/DSC72343.JPG -> t:/test/9170_DSC72343.JPG Fidelity, Bonn-Hardtberg, Juli 2005 thread 'main' panicked at C:\Users\Michael Schnell\...
mschnell1 created a comment on an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
> You can do that and simply check that calling `next()` a second time returns `None`, That is obvious. My question was if (in what cases) it is possible that the next `next()` will return a `...
TechnikTobi created a comment on an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
> Moreover I'll report the issues with the files mentioned. ASAP Thanks, but please do so in a new issue.
mschnell1 created a comment on an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
I started my 1000 file test set.... At some point I get: `` 917: copying //marianne-1/public/hdd_1_1_1/Fotos/002/00249 Bonn 05/DSC72343.JPG -> t:/test/9170_DSC72343.JPG Fidelity, Bonn-Hardtberg...
mschnell1 created a comment on an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
> Having worked on this project for >2 years now, I'd have structured EXIF in a different way, but as with all legacy standards that have been established for multiple decades, this won't go away a...
TechnikTobi created a comment on an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
> This EXIF stuff is really complex and rather weird. Absolutely. The way this is done is really weird. There are the standards on the one side (TIFF and the EXIF specifications that build upon ...
TechnikTobi created a comment on an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
Using `.next()` on `get_tag()` is also new. The reason for this is that underneath this is also an iterator as a TIFF may consist of multiple IFDs, each one storing a version of a specific tag. Thi...
mschnell1 created a comment on an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
> Long story: This EXIF stuff is really complex and rather weird. Thanks you for taking this up ! I really appreciate your work !
mschnell1 created a comment on an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
Ah ! I did exactly what you suggested :) I also simply added a `next()` to the result of `get_tag()`. How is this done correctly
mschnell1 created a comment on an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
@TechnikTobi I did a first test with 0.6.0-betata.1, modifying my code in a way I guessed might be sensible (replacing `data() `by `into_iter()` ). Now the file (that had been written by litt...
TechnikTobi created a comment on an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
Short story: The `.data()` function has been replaced as it does not make any sense anymore. Use `metadata.into_iter().count()` instead. Long story: The `.data()` function has been replaced by u...
mschnell1 created a comment on an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
Ooops ?!?!? ``` let tag_count_old = metadata.data().len(); | ^^^^ method not found in `Metadata` ``` Seems to need to be accessed in a new way ?!?!?
TechnikTobi created a comment on an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
Now available as `0.6.0-beta.1`
TechnikTobi pushed 1 commit to dev_0.6.0 TechnikTobi/little_exif
- Releasing first beta of 0.6.0 006e087
TechnikTobi closed an issue on TechnikTobi/little_exif
works nicely, but still messages
Within the 1500 jpg files under test several show library messages: - Could not validate EXIF header! - Error during decoding: Custom { kind: Other, error: "No EXIF data found!" } - C...
TechnikTobi pushed 5 commits to dev_0.6.0 TechnikTobi/little_exif