Ecosyste.ms: Timeline
Browse the timeline of events for every public repo on GitHub. Data updated hourly from GH Archive.
fingolfin created a review comment on a pull request on JuliaLang/julia
So this is genuinely ambiguous with respect to at least these methods, possibly more: ``` GenericString(string::AbstractString) @ Base strings/annotated.jl:130 SubString(s::AbstractString) @ Bas...
fingolfin created a review comment on a pull request on JuliaLang/julia
`EnvDict` is a singleton type, so it is fine to refer to "the global `ENV`" as it is the only instance that can exist anyway.
fingolfin created a comment on a pull request on JuliaLang/julia
How short examples "should" be is IMHO very subjective and possibly depends on subject matter? Not everything can be demonstrated with a "short" example. To me the colored prompts in examples ar...
fingolfin pushed 1 commit to master JuliaLang/julia
- use textwidth for string display truncation (#55442) It makes a big difference when displaying strings that have wid... bc66047
fingolfin closed a pull request on JuliaLang/julia
use textwidth for string display truncation
This uses the new `textwidth`-based string-truncation functions from #55351 (with some additional refactoring) for truncating strings in the 3-argument `show`, replacing the codepoint-based method ...
fingolfin created a review comment on a pull request on JuliaLang/julia
Maybe imitate what GitHub uses? ```suggestion const _list_bullets = ["• ", "◦ ", "▪︎ "] ```
fingolfin created a comment on an issue on JuliaLang/julia
Just to say, one could also have `rem(x::BigInt, y::T) where {T <: Integer}` return a value of type `T`. That would still be type stable but be more efficient than what is currently being done.
PallHaraldsson created a comment on an issue on JuliaLang/julia
Yes, the funny thing is that the "inaccurate number under discussion seems actually the more accurate one: ``` julia> big(1.0000000000000001e68) 1.00000000000000007253143638152923512615837440964652...
stevengj created a comment on an issue on JuliaLang/julia
I just ran into a student that used this accidentally and was baffled. My suggestion is this: at least print a warning, or maybe throw an error, when this syntax is used in **interactive mode** in...
nickrobinson251 created a review comment on a pull request on JuliaLang/julia
wasn't sure where to was best to do this (i put it in `_finish_julia_init` since that's where most of the user-configurable stuff is, and then plumped for "before `jl_start_threads`"), but actually...
MasonProtter created a comment on a pull request on JuliaLang/julia
@ararslan can you remove your block on merging?
aviatesk pushed 6 commits to avi/fix-atomic-modify-tfunc JuliaLang/julia
- Matmul: dispatch on specific blas paths using an enum (#55002) This expands on the approach taken by https://github... bf6da77
- Scaling `mul!` for generic `AbstractArray`s (#56313) This improves performance in the scaling `mul!` for `StridedArr... c188e0c
- InteractiveUtils.jl: fixes issue where subtypes resolves bindings and causes deprecation warnings (#56306) The curr... 20f933a
- [CRC32c] Support AbstractVector{UInt8} as input (#56164) This is a similar PR to https://github.com/JuliaIO/CRC32.jl... f285de5
- Put `jl_gc_new_weakref` in a header file again (#56319) 5cdf378
- Merge branch 'master' into avi/fix-atomic-modify-tfunc 2900cca
giordano created a review comment on a pull request on JuliaLang/julia
Should this be ```suggestion |`--task-timing` |Enable the collection of per-task timing metrics| ``` ?
MasonProtter created a comment on a pull request on JuliaLang/julia
Here's something that segfaults currently on this PR: ```julia-repl julia> function f() m = Memory{Float64}(undef, 32) m .= rand.() s = 0.0 for x ∈...
nickrobinson251 opened a draft pull request on JuliaLang/julia
Add per-Task user cpu time metric
Close https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/47351 (builds on top of https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/48416) Adds to `Task` a metric for scheduled user CPU time (i.e. amount of time we...
giordano created a comment on an issue on JuliaLang/julia
> Shouldn't we, or could for integers and other accurate numbers? Are you really sure the number `1e68` is accurate, for some definition of accuracy? ```julia-repl julia> big(1e68) 9.999999999999...
giordano created a comment on a pull request on JuliaLang/julia
> I wanted to test this, see size-change, but this didn't work Juliaup uses the upload that happens after the tests complete successfully. You broke the tests for all the platforms. > (usuall...
PallHaraldsson created a comment on an issue on JuliaLang/julia
>in general, we don't promise <1 ULP accuracy for pow. it's nice if it works out well for integers, but that isn't a requirement Shouldn't we, or couldn't for integers and other accurate numbers? ...