Ecosyste.ms: Timeline
Browse the timeline of events for every public repo on GitHub. Data updated hourly from GH Archive.
fingolfin pushed 1 commit to master JuliaLang/julia
- Put `jl_gc_new_weakref` in a header file again (#56319) 5cdf378
fingolfin closed a pull request on JuliaLang/julia
Put `jl_gc_new_weakref` in a header file again
The gcext implementation in [gap](https://github.com/gap-system/gap/)/[GAP.jl](https://github.com/oscar-system/GAP.jl) uses `jl_gc_new_weakref`. Since https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/55608 ...
PallHaraldsson created a comment on an issue on JuliaLang/julia
As you state *min* time is actually better (that's good), and min plus "average GC overhead" is still lower that 1.10.5 min (that would have zero GC): ``` julia> 289.169*1.1687 337.9518103 ``` So ...
oscardssmith created a comment on an issue on JuliaLang/julia
those were vaguely meant to reassociate there isn't a strong a-priori region to believe one is better than another
oscardssmith created a comment on an issue on JuliaLang/julia
in general, we don't promise <1 ULP accuracy for pow. it's nice if it works out well for integers, but that isn't a requirement
mbauman created a comment on an issue on JuliaLang/julia
Sure, but just because Julia grants (or granted) the ability to reassociate doesn't mean that the compiler does (or did). And it doesn't mean the implementation isn't (or wasn't) buggy. On ARM64 ...
KristofferC created a comment on an issue on JuliaLang/julia
It could have been wrong back then as well? All I know is a good result turned worse which seems like a regression no matter what values it used to give on old julia versions.
PallHaraldsson created a comment on a pull request on JuliaLang/julia
>why do you want to remove this? I don't want it as exported API (for e.g. 1.12, not sure if it can disappear in 1.11.x), for people to think may be relied on, existing forever. For the CLI swit...
d-netto created a review comment on a pull request on JuliaLang/julia
> Is there a reason you don't just use the pointer to it as a sort of sentinel value directly instead of having jl_unw_get to do it for you Not really. What you're proposing should work as we...
vtjnash created a review comment on a pull request on JuliaLang/julia
Is there a reason you don't just use the pointer to it as a sort of sentinel value directly instead of having `jl_unw_get` to do it for you: ```suggestion if (maxsize < 1) return 0; bt_d...
fingolfin created a comment on a pull request on JuliaLang/julia
This leaves `jl_lisp_prompt` itself in, now unused. But in any case I agree with @adienes
giordano created a comment on an issue on JuliaLang/julia
> You might be misunderstanding the point of this issue What I tried to show above is that the current result has been the same since v1.8, except for the 1.10-1.11 window, I don't see how that re...
KristofferC created a comment on a pull request on JuliaLang/julia
I didn't see it and this got auto closed because the branch it was targeting got deleted.
lgoettgens created a review comment on a pull request on JuliaLang/julia
```suggestion JL_DLLEXPORT jl_weakref_t *jl_gc_new_weakref(jl_value_t *value); ``` Yeah, should work. @fingolfin do you agree?
d-netto created a review comment on a pull request on JuliaLang/julia
Minor style suggestion: since this is in `gc-common.h`, we should have access to `jl_weakref_t` and `jl_value_t`. Perhaps use those, instead of `struct _jl_weakref_t` and `struct _jl_value_t`?
aravindh-krishnamoorthy created a comment on an issue on JuliaLang/julia
Adding a few top level tests which basically make the same LAPACK calls: ```julia julia> using OpenBLAS_jll, LinearAlgebra julia> strip(unsafe_string(ccall(((:openblas_get_config64_), libopenblas)...
