Ecosyste.ms: Timeline

Browse the timeline of events for every public repo on GitHub. Data updated hourly from GH Archive.

AztecProtocol/aztec-packages

ludamad pushed 1 commit to ad/docs-docker-messaging AztecProtocol/aztec-packages

View on GitHub

ludamad opened a pull request on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages
docs: clean up docker messaging
ludamad created a branch on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages

ad/docs-docker-messaging

benesjan pushed 1 commit to 10-24-feat_bytes_to_fields_requiring_only_1_generic_param AztecProtocol/aztec-packages

View on GitHub

lucasxia01 created a review on a pull request on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages
LGTM

View on GitHub

nventuro created a review comment on a pull request on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages
Thanks! For testing in particular whenever this sort of thing happens I find it quite useful to explain _why_ you're doing it - otherwise when reading a test it's not clear what's even being tested.

View on GitHub

nventuro created a review on a pull request on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages

View on GitHub

nventuro created a review comment on a pull request on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages
I see, I thought maybe the x-coord would be affected. I'd maybe consider however making a point as to how multiple actors will later try to recover the point from the x coord, and if the original y...

View on GitHub

nventuro created a review on a pull request on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages

View on GitHub

benesjan pushed 3 commits to 10-23-refactor_passing_partial_note_logs_through_transient_storage AztecProtocol/aztec-packages

View on GitHub

benesjan pushed 3 commits to 10-24-feat_bytes_to_fields_requiring_only_1_generic_param AztecProtocol/aztec-packages
  • fix: allow more resources for 4epochs tests (#9418) 74a8ad1
  • feat: bytes_to_fields requiring only 1 generic param 066a7a9
  • nuking obsolete test 5ce42f3

View on GitHub

benesjan pushed 2 commits to 10-23-refactor_passing_partial_note_logs_through_transient_storage AztecProtocol/aztec-packages

View on GitHub

benesjan created a review comment on a pull request on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages
Did this naming change here as I consider nullable to be the note struct members which can be delivered in public but might not while the public values are the members which go actually delivered i...

View on GitHub

benesjan created a review on a pull request on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages

View on GitHub

benesjan created a review comment on a pull request on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages
This function will hopefully disappear once all the logs are Field based.

View on GitHub

benesjan created a review on a pull request on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages

View on GitHub

benesjan created a review comment on a pull request on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages
The big diff below is caused by me wrapping the code in 1 more for loop (iterating over both encrypted and unencrypted).

View on GitHub

benesjan created a review on a pull request on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages

View on GitHub

benesjan created a review comment on a pull request on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages
This made NoteProcessor.parseLog function more elegant.

View on GitHub

benesjan created a review on a pull request on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages

View on GitHub

benesjan created a review comment on a pull request on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages
In this file the changes are related to me disabling the "overwriting of transient storage with zeros" change.

View on GitHub

benesjan created a review on a pull request on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages

View on GitHub

benesjan created a review comment on a pull request on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages
I did this change such that we don't have the `as Field` in the resulting code when the value is already actually a field. I originally did this because I though it was causing compilation issue. A...

View on GitHub

benesjan created a review on a pull request on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages

View on GitHub

stevenplatt pushed 1 commit to srp/16-validator-xfer-test AztecProtocol/aztec-packages
  • setting bot tx at max transfers (4) 5ac00a1

View on GitHub

benesjan created a review comment on a pull request on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages
The changes in this file are a bit unfortunate because originally we didn't have to deal with "transient" storage as we were able to just pass the values as args to the teardown function. I deci...

View on GitHub

benesjan created a review on a pull request on AztecProtocol/aztec-packages

View on GitHub

AztecBot pushed 2 commits to release-please--branches--master AztecProtocol/aztec-packages
  • fix: allow more resources for 4epochs tests (#9418) 74a8ad1
  • chore(master): Release 0.60.1 6a1180e

View on GitHub

ludamad pushed 1 commit to master AztecProtocol/aztec-packages
  • fix: allow more resources for 4epochs tests (#9418) 74a8ad1

View on GitHub

ludamad deleted a branch AztecProtocol/aztec-packages

ad/4epochs-resources

Load more